You have the right to file charges against a zoo, but different liability rules may apply to a privately-owned versus a government-owned zoo depending on which state. In California, for instance, persons who own wilds animal are strictly liable for any harm caused by the animal. This means that a person who was attacked by a wild animal may receive compensation without having to prove that the owner had committed negligence that resulted in the animal attack. This strict liability rule also applies in privately owned zoos, so the zoo.

Read More ...

If you have been attacked by a bear, or any wild animal, who may be held liable depends on where the attack happened. If you were attacked by a wild animal within the premises of someone’s private property, you could possibly sue the property owner to get compensation for damages. If the property owner had knowledge of the wild animal’s presence in his or her premises, he or she has the duty to take reasonable precaution to prevent other people from getting attacked by the animal. Failure to take such.

Read More ...

Dog handlers are some of the few excluded from the strict liability dog bite law. This is due to the veterinarian rule, also known as the “assumption-of-risk” defense. This refers to veterinarians, vet technicians, groomers, and the dog handlers’ awareness of getting bitten due to their profession.. A dog handler who was bitten on the job cannot sue because he or she voluntarily chose to work with dogs and accepted the risks that come with the job. Getting bitten is simply an occupational hazard. However, there are still conditions where.

Read More ...

In situations where your dog bit a child due to provocation, the age of the child is an important factor in determining liability. If the victim is a child who is below five years of age, by law he or she cannot be considered negligent. Therefore, the provocation defense will not be applicable. If this is the case, you as the dog owner may be sued. Most states, including California, implement strict liability bite laws. Under the strict liability rule, the owner is responsible for any damages caused by the.

Read More ...

Dogs bitten by other dogs is a common occurrence. When your dog is bitten by another dog, the legal action you can take against him/her depends on which state you are in. California, like most states, implements strict liability laws. This means that the victim does not need to prove that the other dog owner has been negligent before, during or after the biting incident. The negligent owner is liable for any damages or veterinary bills accumulated in caring for your injured dog. If your injured dog has to be.

Read More ...

When pets hurt other people, the owners are generally liable in most states. Laws concerning dog bites vary in each state, and whether the dog bite occured in public land or private property may have an impact on who may be held liable. If you were asked to work in someone’s property, they have the legal responsibility to keep you safe and away from harm. Under the California Dog Bite Law, you can sue the owner of the dog that bit you while you were working on their property. According.

Read More ...

If your dog bit another person in self-defense, it means that your dog was provoked one way or another. In most states, if a dog bit another person after getting provoked, its owner may not be found liable for the resulting injuries. Provocation of a dog includes both intentional actions, such as poking or kicking it, and unintentional ones, such stepping on a dog you didn’t notice was there. This means that provocation may be used by dog owners as a defense against liability. In applying the provocation defense, factors.

Read More ...

Yes, you can recover damages for your injury and trauma. In California, owners of dogs and animals that attack people are considered responsible for the incident. That’s applicable to incidents in both public and private places, as long as the person bitten or attacked was in the area lawfully. If you were not trespassing into your neighbor’s house at the time of the attack, you are entitled to recover damages for your treatment, shock and trauma, and cosmetic enhancement if you desire to erase the bite mark. The first thing.

Read More ...

According to the California state law, owners are generally responsible for any attack made by their animal, regardless of whether the attack happened in a public or private place. In private premises, the assumption is that the victim was there lawfully or with permission and knowledge of the owner. In your case, it appears you would have to bear the liability for the attack–unless you can somehow prove that the child was in or entered your property unlawfully or, in other words, trespassed. That defense, however, can be countered by.

Read More ...

The dog owner’s insurance can indeed be used to recover damages, provided that the policy has provisions for animal attacks. Not all insurance policies cover animal attacks, and some only fully cover the first incident and offer decreasing or even no coverage for the succeeding attacks. The place of the attack also matters, as some insurance policies only offer coverage if the attack is within the area insured. The most common types of insurance that cover animal attacks are the homeowner’s insurance and car insurance. Most homeowners insurance pay for.

Read More ...